[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be950f350512171337o236ebf14t13b2568071ae0836@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat Dec 17 21:37:47 2005
From: waldoalvarez00 at gmail.com (wac)
Subject: a call for full-disclosure to become a
moderatedlist
Hi:
I beleive that such moderated version should be given as an alternative when
people subscribe to this list. I mean in the webpage or in the help mail. I
also don't want this one to be moderated and I feel just fine with the
messages sent but if anyone wants it filtered... Well why not, they have
their rights and who knows If some day I feel that I need it maybe I switch.
Who knows?
Regards
Waldo
On 12/16/05, James Longstreet <jlongs2@....edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Michael Evanchik wrote:
>
> > I second this
>
> There's no point discussing it, or holding it to a vote. The purpose
> of this list is to be unmoderated. The list owner has stated over
> and over that that is the one point he will not concede on.
>
> Kurt Seifried, among others, runs a moderated version of this list.
> I can't vouch for its quality, since I'm not really interested in the
> list being moderated. If you want moderation, look elsewhere. If
> you don't want someone else moderating the list, learn about filters,
> or even your 'D' key.
>
> Calling for full-disclosure to be moderated is pointless and is
> wearing out my 'D' key.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051217/12e8e9cb/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists