full-disclosure - [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon Dec 19 05:23:49 2005
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: [Clips] A small editorial about
	recentevents.(fwd)


Sing that song of apologia!!!


On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Jamie C. Pole wrote:

> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:07:23 -0600
> From: Jamie C. Pole <jpole@...a.com>
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Clips] A small editorial about
>     recentevents.(fwd)
>
>
> Our Federal government cannot enter a disaster area unless invited by
> the governor of the state.  In the case of Katrina, the governor was
> more concerned with getting re-elected than she was with saving her
> constituents.  Her recently-disclosed email messages prove this.
> Also, the mayor ordered a mandatory evacuation (when it was too late
> to enforce), but most people didn't leave.  If you place yourself in
> harms way, is it the government's responsibility to extricate you?
>
> The head of FEMA was a bonehead, but that problem has been fixed.
> Are you now going to tell me that the US Army Corps of Engineers went
> into New Orleans to blow holes in the levees?  Or maybe we caused
> hurricane Katrina with our special nuclear-powered hurricane-generators?
>
> Just checking...
>
> Jamie
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2005, at 10:56 PM, GroundZero Security wrote:
>
> >> lol you mean the RAF stuff ? that was ages ago and we learned from
> >> that. or in the 70s at olympia.
> >> sure that was bad since we didnt even have special forces as we
> >> werent used to terrorists or war anymore
> >> we usually dont bother about such things. usa is mainly focused on
> >> war industry though
> >
> > ok sorry i didnt finish this. i didn't have much sleep last night
> > so execuse me please.
> >
> > what i missed is that we didnt have special forces but we have some
> > now. and i'm very confident they would do a good job.
> > also if we have a disaster we dont have to wait 6 days for help to
> > arrive i trust my gov on that. i feel pretty save also "if"
> > a terrorist attack would happen we surely would not invade a
> > country. unless that countries gov is attacking us.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF


	Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about
	the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise?

	- Steve Thompson