[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20051228130251.GB21359@suespammers.org>
Date: Wed Dec 28 13:02:14 2005
From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa)
Subject: Fortinet's fortigate 100 devices
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:38:05PM +0000, Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
> - Has anyone got any advice regarding the network performance of these
> devices in real world environments. During my testing I noticed they are
> using a Realtek 8139 based NIC. I personally have never had any issues
> with Realtek 8139 cards in environments ranging from slow to medium/high
> bandwidth utilization (40-50Mbps) however any feedback about how the
> Realtek network cards perform in the Fortigate would be greatly appreciated.
This one is very hard to answer. From my experience, there are at
least 5 different models of the 8139 chips. Some will work well, and
some will give you a max throughput of around 9Kbps and can even
lockup under heavy load.
As a rule of thumb, I try to avoid that chip for servers.
> - Any overall opinions or feedback from anyone that has used the device
> in any production environments would be fantastic. Also if anyone knows
> of any competing products I would like be very interested to know about
> them.
I have heard both good and bad feedback on Fortinet products. You might
want to check the Focus-IDS mailing list at securityfocus. People there
might give you better pointers.
Best regards,
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDsoz7pdyWzQ5b5ckRArxVAKCb6xb5Uu2pTh8a5sWJTdvZRyblSQCfYMPr
11TU83s04H9F1ZMdckLD1BI=
=T63K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists