lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <007301c61169$b59ecf80$a600100a@zks.com>
Date: Wed Jan  4 20:04:20 2006
From: marioc at computer.org (Mario Contestabile)
Subject: RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

But come on..Steve Gibson's latest "Security Now" podcast claims he has
'looked it over, and it looks good' ...

Mario Contestabile
Developer , RadialPoint
marioc@...puter.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/e/fps/3704298/



-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Shostack [mailto:adam@...eport.org] 
Sent: January 3, 2006 5:37 PM
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; FunSec
[List]
Subject: Re: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:28:40AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
| The "patch" by Ilfak Guilfanov works, but by disabling a DLL in Windows. 
| So far no problems have been observed by anyone using this patch. You

This is incorrect.  Michael Hennessy has reported problems on the
patch-management mailing list:

> I took the SANS advice and de-registered the dll, and also installed 
> Ilfak Guilfanov's "temporary patch" on 1 win2k machine and 6 XP 
> machines today.
>
> All fine except for one of the XP machines - wouldn't run IE without 
> gpf'ing until I uninstalled the patch - but leaving the dll 
> de-registered didn't seem to cause any grief anywhere, so far.
>
> FWIW, the iexplore crashes left this in the event log:
> 
> Event ID 4097, source : drwatson The application, C:\Program 
> Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe, generated an application error 
> The error occurred on 01/02/2006 @ 14:49:49.709 The exception 
> generated was c0000005 at address 0068E3BA (<nosymbols>)
>
> I suspect that the patch conflicts with an application that is 
> specific to this machine.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=patchmanagement&m=113624877814460&w=2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ