[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <007301c61169$b59ecf80$a600100a@zks.com>
Date: Wed Jan 4 20:04:20 2006
From: marioc at computer.org (Mario Contestabile)
Subject: RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
But come on..Steve Gibson's latest "Security Now" podcast claims he has
'looked it over, and it looks good' ...
Mario Contestabile
Developer , RadialPoint
marioc@...puter.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/e/fps/3704298/
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Shostack [mailto:adam@...eport.org]
Sent: January 3, 2006 5:37 PM
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; FunSec
[List]
Subject: Re: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:28:40AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
| The "patch" by Ilfak Guilfanov works, but by disabling a DLL in Windows.
| So far no problems have been observed by anyone using this patch. You
This is incorrect. Michael Hennessy has reported problems on the
patch-management mailing list:
> I took the SANS advice and de-registered the dll, and also installed
> Ilfak Guilfanov's "temporary patch" on 1 win2k machine and 6 XP
> machines today.
>
> All fine except for one of the XP machines - wouldn't run IE without
> gpf'ing until I uninstalled the patch - but leaving the dll
> de-registered didn't seem to cause any grief anywhere, so far.
>
> FWIW, the iexplore crashes left this in the event log:
>
> Event ID 4097, source : drwatson The application, C:\Program
> Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe, generated an application error
> The error occurred on 01/02/2006 @ 14:49:49.709 The exception
> generated was c0000005 at address 0068E3BA (<nosymbols>)
>
> I suspect that the patch conflicts with an application that is
> specific to this machine.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=patchmanagement&m=113624877814460&w=2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists