Message-ID: <2be58a30601050403i11c2593do310c56d26fb090ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan  5 12:03:23 2006
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

Try some english as a second language courses fuckbag

On 1/3/06, ad@...poverflow.com <ad@...poverflow.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> he try to be good , but everyone remember his shit talks firing about
> netdev & cie , nice try ..
>
> InfoSecBOFH wrote:
> > So this patch is trusted because you said so?
> >
> > I have tested and confirmed that this patch only works in specific
> > scnenarios and does not mitigate the entire issue.  Variations still
> > work.
> >
> > On 1/3/06, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:
> >> Quite a bit of confusing and a vast amount of information coming from
> >> all directions about the WMF 0day. Here are some URL's and generic facts
> >> to set us straight.
> >>
> >> The "patch" by Ilfak Guilfanov works, but by disabling a DLL in Windows.
> >> So far no problems have been observed by anyone using this patch. You
> >> should naturally check it out for yourselves but I and many others
> >> recommend it until Microsoft bothers to show up with their own patch.
> >>
> >> Ilfak is trusted and is in no way a Bad Guy.
> >>
> >> You can find more information about it at his blog:
> >> http://www.hexblog.com/2005/12/wmf_vuln.html
> >>
> >> If you are still not sure about the patch by Ilfak, check out the
> >> discussion of it going on in the funsec list about the patch, with Ilfak
> >> participating:
> >> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> >> Occasional information of new WMF problems keep coming in over there.
> >>
> >> In this URL you can find the best summary I have seen of the WMF issue:
> >> http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=994
> >> by the "SANS ISC diary" team.
> >>
> >> In this URL you can find the best write-up I have seen on the WMF issue:
> >> http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/167
> >> By Matthew Murphy at the "Securiteam Blogs".
> >>
> >> Also, it should be noted at this time that since the first public
> >> discovery of this "problem", a new one has been coming in - every day.
> >> All the ones seen so far are variants of the original and in all ways
> >> the SAME problem. So, it would be best to acknowledge them as the
> >> same... or we will keep having a NEW 0day which really isn't for about 2
> >> months when all these few dozen variations are exhausted.
> >>
> >> A small BUT IMPORTANT correction for future generations:
> >> The 0day was originally found and reported by Hubbard Dan from Websense
> >> on a closed vetted security mailing list, and later on at the Websense
> >> public page. All those who took credit for it took it wrongly.
> >>
> >> Thanks, and a better new year to us all,
> >>
> >>        Gadi.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
>
> iQIVAwUBQ7sAOa+LRXunxpxfAQJCChAA58xG3lsiY5Gi5dQd/lPtRcznLAGKAY9i
> Hosk4mWRnXep9Gd2XpztNNBbePg4l6tSvKKu26bFan+B3A3jYvMpZ8CBq9nptRz+
> MrCb9N4vApJhPTKL1jiydj2/No9QB9g5e6S23Krjj4cLZTLQJqwE2/sHm70ZqIzO
> BUUc8EKDuDgqx//EC4NZwQtZTQmBJNtn252tqP5F5et1t7RRPmbz7Yz5FPqP26wF
> PpNxDXONEMCdDL0RiTdPM6qUpKI510BwuBOJPrJxrb8CCas6wEDSOkb2QiIO//35
> yQKpBV4RK2mJcA28BoHkLPrYbOnMTSbioGSFaJ7FJBlsGi14rXWchpZS8ougjYX4
> hZCxcz1y05ONM37f2RBLffszp96pi83x3HCjIYtMGCwG8oJJ3KteR7ScTOGrccLC
> xIASkilhdWppKfG6J9+TWp5xOXHxjOtn8RiacOovslBnl5FssB4WjQdqtKuGnstf
> B2/+VKOtck7mRue/W6Dz0qFrG+teC2MQUNJX66zSyJnTEvrqFgWvlr/j9MEDqXQR
> K2oTV8XnK8R4vCi813LxHkFlVO6Vj5CYUnrWoMMjQdEyznN3IVGU3IQXXIiDuPpb
> 3Pa2YJvxl6gcGRPaSNVGrxH6Yp238jsdynMKvsWNSYsVZuxoiM3i052tmbTY8b89
> DBwptgDJqo0=
> =YwgE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists