| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200601052345.k05NjvhR021480@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Thu Jan 5 23:47:21 2006 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:15:27 PST, InfoSecBOFH said: > "I did it because SANS said so..." Yes sans is always right and L0pht > was a bunch of blackhats too....... So tell me - how much money does SANS make if they lose their reputation as being right on security? Seems like they have a vested interest in being right, at least a high percentage of the time.... Or look at it another way - between SANS and Microsoft, which one is more likely to be straight-up and honest regarding a security issue? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060105/49e1fc0a/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists