full-disclosure - RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2be58a30601061545k7486180ejf769110595d23db8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat Jan  7 12:24:04 2006
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

None whatsoever because there are line ups of n00bs like n3td3v
begging to take SANS courses.

On 1/5/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:15:27 PST, InfoSecBOFH said:
>
> > "I did it because SANS said so..."  Yes sans is always right and L0pht
> > was a bunch of blackhats too.......
>
> So tell me - how much money does SANS make if they lose their reputation
> as being right on security?  Seems like they have a vested interest in
> being right, at least a high percentage of the time....
>
> Or look at it another way - between SANS and Microsoft, which one is more
> likely to be straight-up and honest regarding a security issue?
>
>
>