full-disclosure - Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200601080217.k082HZLK000320@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sun Jan  8 02:19:00 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Open Letter on the Interpretation of
	"Vulnerability Statistics" 

On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:17:29 PST, InfoSecBOFH said:
> On 1/6/06, Steven M. Christey <coley@...us.mitre.org> wrote:
> >
> > *shrug* things change in 2.5 years.  The answer is fundamentally the same,
> > only I've given up being pedantic about the terminology.
> 
> Yes *most* things change but Guninski will never grow up.

And you will never post something that actually contributes, so I guess
you and George are even...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060107/b79482a5/attachment.bin