full-disclosure - Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2be58a30601081655m4ac08268l79d8f6ef94d5a63c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon Jan  9 00:56:38 2006
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: Open Letter on the Interpretation of
	"Vulnerability Statistics"

Actually George and is one up on me because he also posts nothing of
value anymore.  So here is a question, do you suck every former and
undeserved internet rock star's dick on this list or just the
eurotrash ones?

On 1/7/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:17:29 PST, InfoSecBOFH said:
> > On 1/6/06, Steven M. Christey <coley@...us.mitre.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > *shrug* things change in 2.5 years.  The answer is fundamentally the same,
> > > only I've given up being pedantic about the terminology.
> >
> > Yes *most* things change but Guninski will never grow up.
>
> And you will never post something that actually contributes, so I guess
> you and George are even...
>
>
>