full-disclosure - [OT] Re: can a brother get some disclosure?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0c503c40601251014v6484ed9ay48198e7dfb1b4088@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jan 25 18:14:59 2006
From: kponds at gmail.com (Kevin Ponds)
Subject: [OT] Re: can a brother get some disclosure?

On 1/25/06, Tim <tim-security@...tinelchicken.org> wrote:

>         Did you mean "grammar"?


The ? should go inside the quotation marks.


Ok, perhaps that's enough nit-picking for today.  I am not
> defending the original postingh, but you just might want to review your
> hot-headed emails before you send them out.



*Posting.

On 1/25/06, Tim <tim-security@...tinelchicken.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Edward,
>
> While you are criticising others' grammar, perhaps you should check your
> spelling and your own grammar.
>
>
> > Ok, you're speaking english, but the message just isn't getting accross.
> > Think grammer. Clearly you're trying to boot Windows Vista/XP on the
>         ^^^^^^^
>         Did you mean "grammar"?  Also, this is close to a sentence
>         fragment.
>
> > Well my good sir, don't be so lazy, we're not going to work to win you a
>                                    ^^^
>                               Looks a lot like a ";" or "." would have
>                               been more appropriate here.
>
>
> > partition (Good luck), or mod the EDI so it can reconise UDF or El
>                                                   ^^^^^^^^
>                                                Missing your 'g' key?
>
> Finally, it is bad netiquette to top-post.
>
> Ok, perhaps that's enough nit-picking for today.  I am not
> defending the original postingh, but you just might want to review your
> hot-headed emails before you send them out.
>
> tim
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060125/6fc4279a/attachment.html