[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200603162030.k2GKUatw018992@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu Mar 16 20:52:40 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: strange domain name in phishing email
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:55:43 GMT, Dave Korn said:
> It sure is. Please replace the word "octal" with the word "octet"
> whereever you may have seen it in this thread. An awful lot of people round
> here don't know the difference.
Bonus points if you've been around long enough to have used one of the machines
that originally caused the use of "octet" rather than "byte". ;)
(How many different ways could a KL-10 processor do a no-op, anyhow? :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060316/d936938b/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists