[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <441A229E.5030805@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri Mar 17 02:51:32 2006
From: chromazine at sbcglobal.net (Steve Kudlak)
Subject: Re: strange domain name in phishing email
Now you do make me feel a tad old. ....giggle... but no I never did name
my cat AOBJN and somedays I still do miss the LIGHTS JSYS.;) But alas
ITS was fun and many of us started on it flying fast and loose. Giggle
never could go through channels. More I won't say.
Have Fun,
Sends Steve
P.S. Maybe someone should hold a JEDGAR day party;) Which is of course
cleberated on the anniversary f his death,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:55:43 GMT, Dave Korn said:
>
>
>> It sure is. Please replace the word "octal" with the word "octet"
>>whereever you may have seen it in this thread. An awful lot of people round
>>here don't know the difference.
>>
>>
>
>Bonus points if you've been around long enough to have used one of the machines
>that originally caused the use of "octet" rather than "byte". ;)
>
>(How many different ways could a KL-10 processor do a no-op, anyhow? :)
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists