full-disclosure - Industry calls on Microsoft to scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <003401c65089$2e503d70$6700a8c0@toshibauser>
Date: Sun Mar 26 04:56:08 2006
From: william at lefkovics.net (William Lefkovics)
Subject: Industry calls on Microsoft to
	scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws

>>hence the ideals of being an anonymous group.

Yes, how convenient for you (which was really my point).

What is a 'rogue' employee?  
One that is not trustworthy and doesn't have the gonads to leave their
comfortable pay cheque?

Anyway, best of luck to you, but the initiative your pseudo-consortium put
forth in this thread is misguided, poorly presented, and makes others 'laugh
with glee'.

________________________________

From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:46 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to
scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws

Wow, hence the ideals of being an anonymous group. Like if names were put to
list, they wouldn't be sacked straight away... Wake up, smell the postitives
of being anonymous for five minutes, or maybe that leaves you, CERT, SANS a
bit head rubbed, just like SANS once said FIREFOX posed a lesser threat that
IE. OH, the guys I speak to at MS were chuckling about that one. Of course
SANS reversed their claim that FIREFOX was less vulnerable than IE later,
much later. The credibility of SANS, of course comes into questions, while
folks at n3td3v c onsortium laugh with glee, as the big players get it so
badly wrong infront of the international stage.

On 3/26/06, William Lefkovics <william@...kovics.net> wrote: 

	Not to mention the absence of legitimate names of the folks.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
	[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Mike
Hoye
	Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:08 PM 
	To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
	Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap
	PatchTuesday for Critical flaws

	On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:39:32AM +0100, n3td3v wrote: 
	> One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually
people
	> from MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already.

	You know, legitimate groups don't have to keep claiming, over and
over, that
	they're legit. 

	It's remarkable how that works.

	--
	"Totally mad. Utter nonsense. But we'll do it because it's brilliant
	nonsense." - Douglas Adams

	_______________

	_______________________________________________ 
	Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
	Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
	Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/