[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a166c090603281245v11712402q9648173f305ad416@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Mar 28 21:45:26 2006
From: n3td3v at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on
internet
No security alert? Unofficial patches is very much a security alert. You say
i'm not adding anything to the list, but what are *you* adding, apart from
off-topic bitch remarks about thread authors. When you have the confidence
to post your opinion on the actual topic, then i'll be glad to hear from
you.
On 3/28/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <michealespinola@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Patch Tuesday = Good before third party patches appear
> Third party patch = Evil
> Patch Tuesday = Bad for everyone after third party patches appear,
> even Microsoft...
>
> Ahh, but you forgot one:
>
> n3td3v = Annoying. Posting as an individual or as a "group"...
>
> Your "security alert" has offered nothing in terms of Full Disclosure
> or any actual security alert. You'd be better served to send your
> "opinion" to the Patch Management list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060328/e006af6a/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists