full-disclosure - Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f6cb7b40603281252t6b15db87xde1243648e86872d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Mar 28 21:52:37 2006
From: nocfed at gmail.com (nocfed)
Subject: Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on
	internet

> On 3/28/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <michealespinola@...il.com> wrote:
> > Patch Tuesday = Good before third party patches appear
> > Third party patch = Evil
> > Patch Tuesday = Bad for everyone after third party patches appear,
> > even Microsoft...
> >
> > Ahh, but you forgot one:
> >
> > n3td3v = Annoying.  Posting as an individual or as a "group"...
> >
> > Your "security alert" has offered nothing in terms of Full Disclosure
> > or any actual security alert.  You'd be better served to send your
> > "opinion" to the Patch Management list.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
>
On 3/28/06, n3td3v <n3td3v@...il.com> wrote:
>
> No security alert? Unofficial patches is very much a security alert. You say
> i'm not adding anything to the list, but what are *you* adding, apart from
> off-topic bitch remarks about thread authors. When you have the confidence
> to post your opinion on the actual topic, then i'll be glad to hear from
> you.
>
>

I'm pretty sure that he just did post his opinion on the actual topic.
 You might want to go to a few ESL classes.