full-disclosure - Court Order May Violate First Amendment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200603292141.k2TLf4RV006713@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed Mar 29 22:41:15 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Court Order May Violate First Amendment 

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:08:56 PST, zap zoid said:

> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,189406,00.html

*yawn* If this violates the First Amendment, so does every single gag order
issued by a judge, prohibiting the people involved from discussing the case.

> Anybody else following this story? Thoughts? Is this a security threat
> to the United States?

He screwed her, she had a kid. They fought about who got the kid. He lost,
and trash-talked the mom and the family court judges involved.  The people
who got trash-talked are trying to get the trash-talking stopped. He turns
around, and trash-talks the way they're trying to get the first round of
trash-talking stopped.

I'm well-known as a member of the tinfoil-helmet brigade, but even *I* am
having a problem seeing how this poses a security threat.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060329/95e4fa1c/attachment.bin