full-disclosure - Court Order May Violate First Amendment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <001f01c65379$dc6ac1d0$0201a8c0@ghettopc>
Date: Wed Mar 29 22:44:23 2006
From: y0himba at technolounge.org (y0himba)
Subject: Court Order May Violate First Amendment 

 It isn't  security threat, it is a misuse of our legal system, an unfair
bias towards the mother.  Justice is allegedly impartial, but not in this
case.  

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:41 PM
To: zap zoid
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Court Order May Violate First Amendment 

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:08:56 PST, zap zoid said:

> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,189406,00.html

*yawn* If this violates the First Amendment, so does every single gag order
issued by a judge, prohibiting the people involved from discussing the case.

> Anybody else following this story? Thoughts? Is this a security threat 
> to the United States?

He screwed her, she had a kid. They fought about who got the kid. He lost,
and trash-talked the mom and the family court judges involved.  The people
who got trash-talked are trying to get the trash-talking stopped. He turns
around, and trash-talks the way they're trying to get the first round of
trash-talking stopped.

I'm well-known as a member of the tinfoil-helmet brigade, but even *I* am
having a problem seeing how this poses a security threat.