[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200604201905.k3KJ53Pb021669@monkeys.highspeedweb.net>
Date: Thu Apr 20 20:05:31 2006
From: fractalg at highspeedweb.net (fractalg@...hspeedweb.net)
Subject: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication
Dude, SHUT THE FUCK UP !!!
I think we are all tired of this crap you brought to the list.
Yes, I know that replying isn't the best idea, but this is really getting
annoying...
Now, SHUT THE FUCK UP, pretty please ???
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: quinta-feira, 20 de Abril de 2006 19:17
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For legal reasons this is not a Secunia advisory.
Any republication of this advisory to the Secunia website or to attach the
Secunia URL to the bottom of my advisory via the Full-Disclosure mailing
list is bad pratice. I'm now investigating all the advisories on the Secunia
website which have been stolen as intellectual property, reworded without
prior consent of the authors. n3td3v will be in touch to list all the
advisories believed to be in violation of copyright law and will be
contacting the original owners of advisories to make them away Secunia are
liable. As for the footer message, it fails to say its not affiliated with
advisories. When you subscribe at grok.org.uk, you are not made aware that
Secunia is affiliated with the mailing list and fails to warn users that a
Secunia URL will be placed at the bottom of a user or company disclosure. To
use the argument that "You knew when Subscribing to FD that Secunia would
attach their URL to the bottom of my advisory" is flawed, And I am still
investigating weather to say anything post to Full-Disclosure is straight
away intellectual property of Secunia, giving them supposed legal right to
republish any advisory on the list in any way they see fit. However, because
no prior warning of this at grok.org.uk is given, then there must be an
illegal loophole somewhere, which I am still researching. Findings will be
published as they become apparent.
(c)2006 n3td3v
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists