full-disclosure - Re: DOS device name handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060501195822.GA17423@monstrum.org>
Date: Mon May  1 21:19:50 2006
From: kulikk at monstrum.org (Klaudiusz Kulik)
Subject: Re: DOS device name handling


    Thanks ZARAZA for enlightenment. But... don't You think that it's
stupid? If name is not allowed, why it is when '/' is appended?
In fact these names are the same, effects of using these names are the
same [with or without '/']. And if name is not allowed, why I may create
that prohibited directory? Really, I don't understand. According to MSDN -
- it's feature, but I have doubt. Anyway - thanks again for reply.

-- 
K.