| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200605012029.k41KTFPR005955@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Mon May 1 21:29:23 2006 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Re: DOS device name handling On Mon, 01 May 2006 21:58:22 +0200, Klaudiusz Kulik said: > > Thanks ZARAZA for enlightenment. But... don't You think that it's > stupid? If name is not allowed, why it is when '/' is appended? > In fact these names are the same, effects of using these names are the > same [with or without '/']. And if name is not allowed, why I may create > that prohibited directory? Really, I don't understand. According to MSDN - > - it's feature, but I have doubt. Anyway - thanks again for reply. http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/BAD.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060501/867a1eb6/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists