| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20060504202623.71922.qmail@web53205.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu May 4 21:26:31 2006 From: stevenrakick at yahoo.com (Steven Rakick) Subject: RE: Panda Antivirus Enterprise Secure, NortonAntivirus 2005 and the virus Guys, these are signature-based systems... LET ME SHED SOME LIGHT ON THIS, ALL SIGNATURE-BASED SYSTEMS CAN BE SUBVERTED. THIS IS A KNOWN FACT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING FOR YEARS. Let me be the first to welcome you to the year 1999. From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Thiago H. Pojda Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:00 AM To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Panda Antivirus Enterprise Secure,NortonAntivirus 2005 and the virus The major point of the thread is that some of the most popular AV scanners used in big companies, do not detect it. Yea, I did post that AVG scanner detected it. And also a few other people did the same with their AV scanners. And that is scary because even small or non-so-well-known av scanners detect a slight difference in a virus file and the oh-so-almighty ones don't. On 5/4/06, Steven Rakick <stevenrakick@...oo.com> wrote: Great. Now we're going to have every freaking dork with an AV posting about how their system detected it. GOOD WORK, FUCKO. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists