| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200605251641.k4PGfkCC006438@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Thu May 25 17:42:01 2006 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Responsibility On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:27:07 EDT, Scott Forrest said: > I would think it would be a matter of negligence if the previous IT > Consultant setup wireless access for Hotel Customers to use that also > had direct access to the Hotel's network in some way that a virus could > jump to their business servers. That just doesn't sound like "sound" or > "secure" planning. All too many networks are set up by a McSE (You want fries with that?) who wouldn't know a secure network if it bit them on the ass. And having been bitten, they'd remove all the secure network's teeth to prevent further bites. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060525/44309264/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists