full-disclosure - Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <acdc033d0606090941l1aaec3du32a1dd4cce65871c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jun  9 17:41:54 2006
From: michealespinola at gmail.com (Micheal Espinola Jr)
Subject: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward.
	It may just be the right way backward.

Understood.  :-)

On 6/9/06, Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@...ohio.edu> wrote:
> > Your interpretation of the Internet is a bit distorted.
>
> We're not talking about authenticated websites here (perhaps I should
> have made that more clear), nor are we talking about using TOR, etc. for
> malicious purposes.
>
> For the purpose of this (largely theoretical) argument, I meant
> "publicly accessible, non-authenticated websites".
>


-- 
ME2