full-disclosure - Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060609165632.GI29711@suespammers.org>
Date: Fri Jun  9 17:55:55 2006
From: rodrigob at darkover.org (Rodrigo Barbosa)
Subject: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward.
	It may just be the right way backward.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:33:39PM -0400, Michael Holstein wrote:
> >Your interpretation of the Internet is a bit distorted.
> 
> We're not talking about authenticated websites here (perhaps I should 
> have made that more clear), nor are we talking about using TOR, etc. for 
> malicious purposes.
> 
> For the purpose of this (largely theoretical) argument, I meant 
> "publicly accessible, non-authenticated websites".

Just because a park is a public place doesn't give me the write
to, lets say, drive a car over the grass.

Even if public places there are rules that should be followed.

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEiafypdyWzQ5b5ckRAvOQAKCed74EcYcxkphgBWt0yrCtlpe2/wCgvFG3
qg91GcAr7Twpg6hcxJiVQzY=
=G/OL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----