full-disclosure - Re: To XSS or not?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:54:24 +0300
From: "Valery Marchuk" <tecklord@...ocom.cv.ua>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: To XSS or not?

Separating just XSS vulns from others is not an option. It would make more 
sense to create a separate mailing list for vulnerabilities in Web 
applications.
> Major ones could still be reported on the other lists.
If kiddies discover them, then how should they know that the vulnerability 
they`ve found is not a major one? They`ve desided to publish a vuln to the 
list, because it seems to be important to them :)



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aaron Gray" <angray@...b.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] To XSS or not?


> Major ones could still be reported on the other lists.
>
> Aaron
>
>> something like xsstraq powered on securityfocus should be cleaner yep :)
>>
>>> Maybe there should be a special XSS list that could specialize in that 
>>> area ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/