full-disclosure - Re: FD Charter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f1f7b60608021413n28fef837ld8cba877b249fe16@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:13:42 -0400
From: "Peter Dawson" <slash.pd@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: FD Charter

""censorship in any form is wrong whether you agree with what
people say or not"
[..]
" we own the interweb, we create the laws and no one will ever stop us.
That's why this list is called "FULL DISCLOSURE"


Hear Hear !! Thats so soooo correct StackSmasher !!


On 8/2/06, Stack Smasher <stacksmasher@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Dude, Go fuck yourself! If you don't like this list then don't
> subscribe, simple as that. I think most people on this list believe
> that censorship in any form is wrong whether you agree with what
> people say or not. And to say that someones E-Mail message is "libel"
> just shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, we own
> the interweb, we create the laws and no one will ever stop us. That's
> why this list is called "FULL DISCLOSURE" not Matt Burnett's fucking
> whine blog about everything that is sad in my life.........
>
> Stacksmasher
>
>
> On 8/2/06, Matt Burnett <marukka@....com> wrote:
> > The charter says the list is supposed to be "self-policing". How do
> > we take action against offending members, short of a d0s? The charter
> > also says that management can remove members for "spamming" or
> > "misappropriation". Have anyone from management read any of n3td3v's
> > posts? Am i the only on who considers n3td3v's posts to libel?
> > Couldnt his/her advertising his/her own list be considered spam. I
> > really want to know how a group can be self-policing if they have no
> > ability to take action?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> "If you see me laughing, you better have backups"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



-- 
http://peterdawson.typepad.com
PeterDawson Home of ThoughtFlickr's
"This message is printed on Recycled Electrons."

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/