full-disclosure - Re: FYI: Pay for disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44D112A7.1030602@babtras.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:01:27 -0600
From: Cory <snort@...tras.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: FYI: Pay for disclosure

I personally feel the deal should be:

Give the vendor 30 days of exclusive rights to purchase the data. After 
which, it is made available to all buyers.

John Dietz wrote:
> I agree, it does seem a lot like extortion the way they present it on 
> that site, but putting myself in their shoes, I'm having a hard time 
> figuring a way to get paid for all my hard work without it sounding so 
> much like extortion.  One thing for sure I would change is the 30-day 
> deal.  The only real way to be fair (and legitimate) on this subject 
> is to treat it like any other merchandise.  Either offer it one time 
> for one lump fee to the first buyer or sell it for one reduced rate to 
> everyone who wants to buy it.  I can see where they would want the 
> vendor to have some extra time to fix the issue before releasing it to 
> anyone else, but this is walking a fine line towards extortion.  Best 
> bet would be consult a lawyer before doing anything like this...
>
> On 8/2/06, *Thierry Zoller* <Thierry@...ler.lu 
> <mailto:Thierry@...ler.lu>> wrote:
>
>     Dear List,
>
>     Just to be a bit more clearer, I am not opposed to being paid for the
>     research one did, I just find it astonishing to read "If the vendor
>     buys the analysis it is given 30 days protection for all
>     private information included in this analysis."
>
>     This sounds a bit like the mob to me, "protection money".
>
>
>
>     --
>     http://secdev.zoller.lu
>     Thierry Zoller
>     Fingerprint : 5D84 BFDC CD36 A951 2C45  2E57 28B3 75DD 0AC6 F1C7
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>     Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>     Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> There is intelligence is in having all the answers, but wisdom lies in 
> knowing which of the questions to answer.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/