[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df8ba96d0609111340m1d0ecde3j4b8103c542254ffd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:40:36 +0100
From: c0ntex <c0ntexb@...il.com>
To: "pauls@...allas.edu" <pauls@...allas.edu>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt
for this
If you consider that America are able to lie about the weapons of mass
destruction and then admit it, use chemical weapons in Iraq and lie
about it and then admit it, trick Saudi Arabia that Sadam Hussein was
attacking their border to allow army convoys to be deployed in their
country, mishandle Iraqs millions of dollars which seemed to vanish
(which is currently under investigation with 3 confirmed arrests), a
power company who coincidentally has a top US official on the board of
directors win a multi million dollar contract with no competition to
do ALL the power restoration work in Iraq.
So America own the world with their porkies yet the most powerful
country in the world is incapable of influencing 8 or 10 people about
a war record which is controlled by the US government, influencing 1
man in charge of the IVAW (which they never actually deny this man was
a member), and drop 2 news articles to Americans media to bad name
this man then you have been eating too many pancakes and twinkies.
On Wikipedia they also discuss the mans "criminal history", what has
that got to do with anything other than making the man seem
unreliable.
If you look at the media on my blog, you will notice many distressing
issues, you will actually see innocent people being shot and the
soldiers laughing on several occasions - it is not just this one video
by this one man.
The most well known behind the scenes investigation program
"Dispatches", from the UK does numerous documentaries on these issues,
as well as the most highly credible news reporters - are they also
telling porkies? I hardly think so.
There are numerous other people who talk about the terror that has
gone on in Iraq, including the use white phosphorous of which is then
verified by 2 ex soldiers (US) along with live media footage of the
drops, doctor examinations and leaked documents from the US and
UK..... but like I said, you are all entitled to your own opinions.
On 11/09/06, pauls@...allas.edu <pauls@...allas.edu> wrote:
> --On September 11, 2006 8:20:51 PM +0100 c0ntex <c0ntexb@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > You are entitled to your opinion.
> >
> Yeah, and it sucks this his is fact-based, doesn't it?
>
> Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
> Adjunct Information Security Officer
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
--
regards
c0ntex
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists