full-disclosure - Re: any tools for testing RPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609281418.k8SEIUFq003562@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:18:30 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: 6ackpace <6ackpace@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: any tools for testing RPC

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:38:58 +0530, 6ackpace said:

> I am testing RPC functionality in snort 

You're *probably* testing 1 of the following 3 things:

1) That Snort detects known exploits it has a fingerprint for. Just letting it
watch a wire that has Nessus or Metasploit pumping out exploits will likely
test that.

2) That Snort detects things *similar* to things it has a fingerprint for (and
additionally, if it false-positives on things it shouldn't).

3) That Snort doesn't itself get blown up by a malicious packet that claims to
be an RPC, but which contains malformed code designed to exploit Snort's
decoder functions.

Knowing what to recommend is dependent on what exactly you're testing....

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/