full-disclosure - Re: Security as an Enabler - Virtual Trust: An Open Challenge to All InfoSec Professionals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efgjhf$l8c$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:43:12 +0100
From: "Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn" <davek_throwaway@...mail.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Security as an Enabler - Virtual Trust: An
	Open Challenge to All InfoSec Professionals

Kenneth F. Belva wrote:
> I've been defending Virtual Trust as an enabler for the past three
> days on the full-disclosure list. So far, fairly successfully.

  An enabler *of* anything in particular?  Or just some kind of magic 
enabling pixie dust, good for all purposes?

> Here's the challenge: How creative are you *for* VT, *against* VT and
> determining the *impact* of VT?

  What does "being creative *for*" something even mean?

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/