full-disclosure - "Fire and forget" exploits?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <589e556c0610200734p34a6da9avbcdf2319698ae9f5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:34:19 -0400
From: "Brendan Dolan-Gavitt" <mooyix@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: "Fire and forget" exploits?

Hi,
  I'm looking for examples of (remote) security vulnerabilities whose
exploitation involves no guesswork--eg, no bruteforcing the return
address, or altering your exploit based on the server's response, etc.
  It seems like this kind of exploit is dying out, particularly as
different flavors of Linux proliferate, each with their own slightly
different libc and userland; in the Windows world, however, we still
find "universal" exploits that work on NT4/2k/XP over a variety of
service packs.
  Anyways, if anyone has come across things like this, I'd greatly
appreciate hearing about it. I'm working on some new methods to
deliver exploits at once while minimizing recon.

Thanks,
  Brendan Dolan-Gavitt

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/