[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706081132.00964.admin@digibase.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:32:00 -0400
From: Kradorex Xeron <admin@...ibase.ca>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: You shady bastards.
On Friday 08 June 2007 08:04, Thierry Zoller wrote:
> Dear Kradorex,
> Oh now canada enters the game, somebody from russia pleae also comment
> on Luxemburgish law, awwwweessome.
>
> It is not logic, it's law (read: positive law). It applies to Mail
> only, get over it. It gives you legal ground to sue. Can you grasp
> the concept here?
Okay, if you want to go about it that way and use the law in this "game:"..
In that event: It should therefore be the user's responsibility alone, nobody
else's reguardless of departure reason (Fired, quit, etc) to tell the people
that the specified mailbox will be terminated. Furthermore, mail should be
dropped upon employee's depature, reguardless if the user made those
statements to those who he/she communicates with, as there would be nobody
else that has legal qualification to touch mail sent to that box, therefore
anyone not contacted who continues to send mail to the defunct address, too
bad. They may get notified later on, they may not, just continue dropping the
mail.
As long as the caretaking of defunct mailboxes is under someone else's
control, there will be "snooping" going on
So best option: Terminate account, delete all mail in the box and being
received for then on, have nobody take care of any defunct mailboxes. That
way, nobody could be exposed to privacy invasion lawsuits.
End of Problem.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists