full-disclosure - Re: Right, or wrong?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:05:33 -0700
From: "Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor" <evdo.hsdpa@...il.com>
To: "Jared DeMott" <demottja@....edu>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Right, or wrong?

Ask gates what his business position is regarding bugs

On 8/7/07, Jared DeMott <demottja@....edu> wrote:
> All:
>
> So, I've tried the vendor pay model for bug hunting and it wasn't always
> well received.  Apparently auction sites and 3 party purchasers are
> fine, but some folks don't like the idea of selling directly to the
> vendor.  I was thinking that this would be ideal since the vendor would
> have the most interest in knowing about/fixing the bug.  My question to
> the list is this:
> Is it morally right, wrong, don't know, don't care, good business, bad
> business, etc.?  Either way we're moving away from that model, but I was
> just curious how others on FD see it.
>
> Blessings,
> Jared
> --
Robert Q Kim, Wireless Internet Provider
http://evdo-coverage.com/satellite-wireless-internet.html
http://groups.google.com/group/unpaid-overtime
2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101
Suite 203 Unpaid Overtime Dept
Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007
206 984 0880

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/