[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <608d9700709251423u13e47db0p28cfe5a351fcb606@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:23:54 +0200
From: "Juergen Marester" <marester.juergen@...il.com>
To: "Gadi Evron" <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: Chad Perrin <perrin@...theon.com>,
Lamont Granquist <lamont@...iptkiddie.org>,
"pdp \(architect\)" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>, Casper.Dik@....com,
Roland Kuhn <rkuhn@....physik.tu-muenchen.de>,
"Thor \(Hammer of God\)" <thor@...merofgod.com>,
full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: defining 0day
0day means vulnerability which was never used IRL, or use 0 time, thats why
we use term 0day.
But 0day doesnt mean it's an new type of vulnerability, otherwise the
appopriate term should be 0-vulnerability.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists