[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709252120.l8PLKqEg021931@mx1.fhda.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:20:52 -0700
From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid@...a.edu>
To: "'Gadi Evron'" <ge@...uxbox.org>,
"'Thor \(Hammer of God\)'" <thor@...merofgod.com>
Cc: 'Chad Perrin' <perrin@...theon.com>,
'Lamont Granquist' <lamont@...iptkiddie.org>,
"'pdp \(architect\)'" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>, Casper.Dik@....COM,
'Roland Kuhn' <rkuhn@....physik.tu-muenchen.de>,
full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
'Crispin Cowan' <crispin@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: defining 0day
> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean,
> regardless of previous definitions?
I think there is some slight residual usefulness to designating
vulnerabilities whose first public disclosure results from
discovery/analysis of an active exploit already "in the wild". ("0 days"
thus being the elapsed time from public disclosure of the vulnerability to
appearance of a live threat exploiting it, a characteristic which an unknown
vulnerability may only aspire to, and a patched one may never live down.)
David Gillett
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists