full-disclosure - Re: Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable ifbreached?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24429.1192125128@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:52:08 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Kelly Robinson <caliana1989@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable ifbreached?

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:38:02 +1000, Kelly Robinson said:

> specific examples at the moment) I am wondering if Disclaimers can be
> referenced in a courtroom in a client's defence and if not, is it specificly

There is one place that the "This message may contain privileged information"
variety of disclaimer has a purpose.  If the addressee has an ongoing relationship
with the sender, that involves info that actually *is* privileged, it provides
an "out" if a blanket subpoena shows up for some e-discovery purpose - they
may be able to get *some* of the e-mails, but not privileged ones.

Of course, some half-wits then go and splat it on *all* their mail - but that
most likely constitutes "over-warning" - if it was *only* on the relevant e-mail,
then seeing one in a pile of subpoena'ed mail would be an automatic flag to
treat it as "disclosed erroneously".  But if it's on all of them, it loses its
warning value.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/