full-disclosure - Re: Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if breached?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f3ddb5d0710102244x75eae4fbn50b0bdae61a73aaf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:44:08 -0700
From: Troy <gimmespam@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if
	breached?

On 10/10/07, Ray P <sixsigma98@...mail.com> wrote:
>
> Would the _intended_ recipient have a case against the sender for
> contractual failure to protect confidential information (or whatever) if the
> _un_intended recipient posts it somewhere or otherwise discloses its
> contents?
>

I'm surprised we don't see more disclaimers with a copyright statement in
them. I would think that using copyright law as an argument against
unauthorized distribution of an email would stand a better chance in court
than a non-binding disclaimer at the bottom of the message.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/