[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16707.1196623502@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:25:02 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: jf <jf@...glingpointers.net>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: authentic hackers still do it for the love
... (was: Hell Camp: It never pays enough)
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:47:11 GMT, jf said:
> Here is the simple truth, there is no underlying outlook,
> background, dogma or set of ethics that define hacking. The only theme
> that applies across the board is breaking computer security.
And there's still a few hold-outs that don't agree with *that* theme either,
because "hacking" had a different meaning back in the Elder Days.
Of course, English is a living language, and terms like "hacker" and "0-day"
get redefined, despite our best efforts at preventing it.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists