[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <350.1196895770@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:02:50 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: secreview@...hmail.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers -
Exposed
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:02:26 EST, secreview@...hmail.com said:
> "Generally our reviews are done by reading the contents of the
> companies website. We strip away all the marketing fluff and we
> look for untruths, poor grammar, quality of service, team talent
> and capabilities, site clarity, etc. If the website leaves us with
> questions, or sounds too good to be true we call the security
> company being reviewed and engage them in conversation about their
> capabilities and offerings."
>
> You'll notice that the above is an exact quote and not some altered
> version of what was said taken out of context by someone ("trains")
> trying to sound smart.
So you take *their* contents and strip marketing fluff, but you don't like
it when somebody else does the same thing to your text?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists