full-disclosure - Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + )

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f1f7b60712200711w5c066184ve37a385348b606dc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:11:43 -0500
From: "Peter Dawson" <slash.pd@...il.com>
To: "Full-Disclosure dis" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed]
	Cybertrust ( C + )

Agreed.  !!

I think theres a lot of 'fair play' with the secreview folks.  -- "We're
going to give Cybertrust a "C" but if you can convince us that they deserve
a different grade then we'll revise our opinion."

So they are open for rebuttals and to changing their opinions !

On Dec 20, 2007 9:55 AM, Epic <epic@...k3r.com> wrote:

> Isn't ANY review subjective to opinion?    I do not understand the basis
> of this flame.  It appears to me that a lot of the reviews on this site
> offer some great insight into the companies being presented.   Granted it is
> an opinion, but that is what a blog is isn't it?
>
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/