lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:24:57 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: Elazar Broad <elazarb@...thlink.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, reepex <reepex@...il.com>
Cc: Elazar Broad <elazarb@...thlink.net>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll
 Multiple Buffer Overflows

Thanks for the clarification Vladis. To me the A's are kind of like the UV dye that they put in an AC system when looking for leaks...

Elazar

-----Original Message-----
>From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
>Sent: Dec 26, 2007 1:28 AM
>To: reepex <reepex@...il.com>
>Cc: Elazar Broad <elazarb@...thlink.net>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll Multiple Buffer Overflows
>
>On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:53:29 CST, reepex said:
>
>> How does a bunch of 'A's prove something is exploitable?
>
>If a bunch of A's causes the EIP to end up as x'41414141', it's 95% of the
>way to being an exploit.  If it gets you some *other* crash, it's probably
>at least 30% to 40% of the way to an exploit.
>
>Go back and read the analysis of the NTP buffer overflow from a number of years
>back.  Truly a classic - they managed to leverage a *one byte* overflow into
>a complete and total rooting of the box.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ