[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <003d01c890af$63f7f450$1902a8c0@china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:40:33 +0100
From: "zwell.nosec" <zwell.nosec@...il.com>
To: <taneja.security@...il.com>,
<full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Cc: websecurity@...appsec.org
Subject:
RE: Re: 答复: 答复: The reason why "Pangolin is backdoor"
Yep, that’s the voice I’m waiting for ; )
Do all analyzing things yourself firstly!
_____
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of
taneja.security@...il.com
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:29 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Cc: websecurity@...appsec.org
Subject: [Full-disclosure]Re: [Full-disclosure] 答复: 答复:
[Full-disclosure] The reason why "Pangolin is backdoor"
Why to believe on Antivirus !!! check it out urself ......No malicious
activity
no bot, no keylogger, plain code to .....:)
Then what is the meaning of BACKDOORED??
On 3/27/08, zwell.nosec <zwell.nosec@...il.com> wrote:
Oh, Really?
So you can compress using UPX again, then upload to virustotal.
Check it out, ;)
Thanks
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Razi Shaban [mailto:razishaban@...il.com]
发送时间: 2008年3月27日 14:54
收件人: zwell.nosec
抄送: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; websecurity@...appsec.org
主题: Re: 答复: [Full-disclosure] The reason why "Pangolin is backdoor"
I have enough experience with UPX to know that it's a fairly good packer.
If you placed the backdoor into the code yourself, I'm not surprised
that the packed version is UD by most virus-scanner.
Doesn't make it any less of a backdoor.
--
Razi
On 3/27/08, zwell.nosec <zwell.nosec@...il.com> wrote:
> Just do it yourself pls, using the "backdoored" pangolin.exe you think and
> decompress it, then upload to virustotal, I did not change any bits ;)
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Razi Shaban [mailto:razishaban@...il.com]
> 发送时间: 2008年3月27日 14:32
> 收件人: zwell.nosec
> 抄送: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; websecurity@...appsec.org
> 主题: Re: [Full-disclosure] The reason why "Pangolin is backdoor"
>
>
> Wow! Cryptors prevent viruses from being detected?
>
> Who would have thought!
>
>
> --
> Razi
>
>
> On 3/27/08, zwell.nosec <zwell.nosec@...il.com> wrote:
> > Pangolin really is a backdoor? Let's do this step to make sure:
> > 1.Download UPX from upx.sf.net
> > 2.In cmd shell, run "upx.exe -d pangolin.exe"
> > 3.Upload the new pangolin.exe(actually the origin) to virustotal
> > 4.Check the result again
> > I do these, and the result is:
> > http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/b9d55c751d5eed7b34cda3fe708b1bd7
> >
> > We can see
> >
>
Kaspersky,Sophos,F-Secure,CAT-QuickHeal,F-Prot,Ikarus,AntiVir,Prevx1,TheHack
> > er,Webwasher-Gateway will not alert any more.
> >
> > You judge what is it! Or maybe we should think about what does these
> > Antivirus do???
> >
> > Thanks ;)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists