full-disclosure - Re: security industry software license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6158bb410810111428k7148e326u77d9f7da088784ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:28:41 -0400
From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: security industry software license

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:47 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
> What's a few million here, a few billion there in the name of national
> security? Money hasn't stopped the Department of Homeland Security
> implement far more stupider things in the past. No, I don't think
> money is the issue here, what the issue here is, is ironing out the
> details to make this whole thing workable and effective, and getting
> cross-government, cross-sector cooperation with rolling the scheme out
> and it be made an industry standard that everyone is agreed upon. That
> is the real challenge that faces us, not how much money its going to
> cost. We can talk about the money later, let's just get the proposal
> details worked out and put on the table first and see if its got a
> chance for any funding.

werent u just the 1 bitching about the government slating 30 million
for security?  but i guess its okay if it's _ur_ idea instead of
congress's idea?

it wont work, next rant.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/