full-disclosure - Re: security industry software license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2abd77e70810111652v7b8c43c5jd22bae6e0bb3920b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:52:54 +0100
From: AaRoNg11 <aarong11@...il.com>
To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: security industry software license

I really don't understand how you even think this idea has any chance of
succeeding. You obviously didn't read my response properly; not only did I
address issues of money, but also the fact that it would be absolutely
impossible to implement such a system due to existing infrastructures and
lack of records. Please read the rest of my response properly.

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 5:47 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:47 AM, AaRoNg11 <aarong11@...il.com> wrote:
> > A licensing system of this size would cost millions, if not billions to
> implement.
>
> What's a few million here, a few billion there in the name of national
> security? Money hasn't stopped the Department of Homeland Security
> implement far more stupider things in the past. No, I don't think
> money is the issue here, what the issue here is, is ironing out the
> details to make this whole thing workable and effective, and getting
> cross-government, cross-sector cooperation with rolling the scheme out
> and it be made an industry standard that everyone is agreed upon. That
> is the real challenge that faces us, not how much money its going to
> cost. We can talk about the money later, let's just get the proposal
> details worked out and put on the table first and see if its got a
> chance for any funding.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

-- 
Aaron Goulden

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/