[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6158bb410812021011p6029b3bfxadb35266b7f1af91@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:11:18 -0500
From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
To: "Andy McKnight" <andy.mcknight@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: More proof that Microsoft products are
probably backdoored
all speculation:
no 1 knows 4 sure.
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm
c how i did that n3td3v? i posted links, nd talked about the article
w/out stealing ppls work.
pay attention.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
>>
>> u arent getting it.
>>
>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors. they r talking about actual
>> backdoors in the code. so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
>> acess any windows system regarless. they r saying that microsoft has
>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
>> system, patched or not. pay attention.
>
> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored
> here. The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms
> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
> available through P2P to full remote system access.
>
> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other
> than this statement?
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists