full-disclosure - Re: More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b6ee9310812030034laa99d7k758c619c817e8ba7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:34:56 +0000
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: More proof that Microsoft products are
	probably backdoored

You're like a shite that won't flush away.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
> all speculation:
>
> no 1 knows 4 sure.
>
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss
>
> http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
>
> http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm
>
> c how i did that n3td3v?  i posted links, nd talked about the article
> w/out stealing ppls work.
>
> pay attention.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
>>>
>>> u arent getting it.
>>>
>>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors.  they r talking about actual
>>> backdoors in the code.  so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
>>> acess any windows system regarless.  they r saying that microsoft has
>>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
>>> system, patched or not.  pay attention.
>>
>> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored
>> here.  The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms
>> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
>> available through P2P to full remote system access.
>>
>> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other
>> than this statement?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/