full-disclosure - Re: Why are you against n3td3v?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:09:58 +0000
From: andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why are you against n3td3v?

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:51 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:09:45 GMT, "andrew.wallace" said:
>
>> I can't help if Robert Lemos, Neal Krawetz gave false reports about
>> n3td3v, that seems to have damaged us a lot and having to defend my
>> position constantly to a bunch of aliases on full-disclosure because
>> they believed something that was written in the media and had an
>> expectation and when that expectation couldn't be met, they thought
>> I'm a lie and a fake and the members of the n3td3v mailing list can't
>> be real.
>
> I hate to inject some actual reality, but a few things to consider:
>
> 1) 'n3td3v' was *already* widely regarded as a troll when Krawetz did
> his research - he picked 'n3td3v' *specifically because* it was regarded
> as the biggest security troll since Gobbles.

I'm not a troll and neither was Gobbles.

> 2) I suspect that the vast majority of full-disclosure readers either
> didn't know or didn't care about Krawetz's posting until you made a
> point of complaining about it and invoked the Streisand Effect on yourself.

You don't know the vast majority, you social with a few names on
full-disclosure who are active posters.

> 3) The high troll factor of 'n3td3v' on the full-disclosure list scared
> off a very high percentage of the full-disclosure people who concluded that
> any list of 4,500+ run by a troll/idiot of the caliber seen on full-disclosure
> *must* be composed mostly of sock puppets and other trolls.
>

I'm not a troll and only serious researchers are subscribed to the
n3td3v mailing list group.

That was the mistake made people thought I was a troll, n3td3v isn't a
troll its been real the whole time.

> Seriously - go back and re-read your postings over the past several years,
> and then ask yourself "What would *I* think about this poster if I didn't
> know who he was?".

I have and I see me saying things that people thought I was saying to
get a reaction when they are actually real things that are going on
and my actual opinion on things.

The only actual troll i've seen *ever* on full-disclosure is "Ureleet"
thats your troll, neither n3td3v or Gobbles have ever been trolls.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/