lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f80feaf0901221517q14524cd5u7def04add9471a5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:17:01 -0500
From: j-f sentier <j.sentiar@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate

Nop, you spread yours.

Anyways ....

you got pwned, no doubt it's you, you have the same profile mofo, and in the
same situation you'll do the same.

Die in the same grave than n3td3v.

2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <avri.schneider@...il.com>

> The fact that he bears the same name as me, does not mean it's me.
>
> I don't spam propaganda - I invalidate yours.
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:16 AM, j-f sentier <j.sentiar@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> which propaganda ?
>>
>> you're spamming propaganda everytime you post.
>>
>> But i understand why now :
>>
>> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1049327.html
>>
>> "The footage also shows an Israeli soldier, believed by the military
>> police to be Corporal Avraham Schneider, picking up stones and participating
>> in the disturbance, instead of preventing it. "
>>
>> Everything is clearer than ever.
>> 2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <avri.schneider@...il.com>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, <A.L.M.Buxey@...ro.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> > I called for John Cartwright to setup a non-technical cyber security
>>>> > political full-disclosure mailing list some time ago, nothing was
>>>> > setup.
>>>>
>>>> because he didnt want to - and theres no demand?
>>>>
>>>> > What are the solutions for splitting up full-disclosure into technical
>>>> > and non-technical conversation unless two seperate mailing lists are
>>>> > created?
>>>>
>>>> go off and create a yahoo or google mailing list for such drivel
>>>
>>> I second that. If he wants to have a list for different types of
>>> discussions, the best choice is to just open one yourself.
>>>
>>> As for getting 'traffic' there, I doubt people would stop posting here
>>> and start posting there (as nothing would stop them from posting it here).
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> and let FD go back to what it was a few years back - readable and
>>>> useful!
>>>
>>> FD is un-moderated and as such people can post whatever they want
>>> (security related or not).
>>>
>>> Usually, people would avoid annoying others with non-security related
>>> topics - but in the case of js-sentiner and co., one can expect some spam.
>>>
>>> Sometimes, when they decide to attack others (either with propaganda, or
>>> just because they are bored) , those attacked have two options - either a)
>>> ignore it or b) respond with non-security related posts and defend
>>> themselves (or oppose their propaganda).
>>>
>>> As far as readibility is concerned, that can easily be accomplished by
>>> either white or black list filters - i.e. if you only care about a certain
>>> vendor's patch notifications, put a filter to get them and blacklist the
>>> rest; if you care not to get any andrew wallase/avraham schneider/js
>>> sentier/whatever/whoever conversations - set a filter for that - and you are
>>> back with a readable FD.
>>>
>>> Just keep in mind that your posts requesting FD to go back to being
>>> readable, are not computer security related either (at least without
>>> wickedly twisting the meaning of the phrase 'computer security').
>>>
>>> So for the same reason you find it OK to post your request (and it is),
>>> andrew finds it OK to posts his (and it is).
>>>
>>> Not trying to defend n3td3v or anything - but there's some hypocricy
>>> here.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ala
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ