| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6a5e46470910102032r5f10dcf1m7ab228f31823ab88@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:32:49 -0500 From: Rohit Patnaik <quanticle@...il.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: When is it valid to claim that a vulnerability leads to a remote attack? Well, why are you relying on Thierry's clock to date your message? Your e-mail client should use your local clock/mail server clock to timestamp messages. --Rohit Patnaik On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Chris <r0ck@...ramail.com> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Thierry Zoller" <Thierry@...ler.lu> >> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk >> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, "Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler@...ibm.com> >> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] When is it valid to claim that a vulnerability leads to a remote attack? >> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:11:50 +0200 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Thierry, please fix your clock. > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way: > Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com > > Powered by Outblaze > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists