full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Patents the "sudo" command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7897.1258048751@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:59:11 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@...rtesan.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Patents the "sudo" command

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:36:19 EST, "Todd C. Miller" said:

> privileges.  The actual "invention" appears to be that the user is
> able to perform an action as a different user without having to
> type in the name of that other user when authenticating.

Umm... my check of my 'sudo' manpage says that the '-u username' is
optional, and I don't remember having to use '-u root', so it's supported
doing it without having to type the target username for years...

Unless I'm misunderstanding your interpretation of the invention and how
it compares to traditional sudo usage?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/